How does arguing in alternative work here? Statement was either intended 2B true or not. 1 thing to say "absolutely protected or true"...
See this movie before http://electionlawblog.org/?p=93682 https://twitter.com/aaronblake/status/883668308708524032 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
But even Schrodinger would be confused with "it was not intended 2B true, oh, and it was totally true."
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.