Roberts is the exact Friendly/Rehnquist hybrid that his cv predicts.
I also think Roberts (aside from on issues of race) was less ideological and more of a U.S. Chamber type of conservative than true believerhttps://twitter.com/MikeSacksEsq/status/879704310317105157 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But yes, basically I agree. Decisions in NFIB v Sebelius and King v Burwell clearly driven by fealty to Big Health.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Worst decisions are Citizens United and Shelby County. Dissents in gay rights cases neither race nor CofC.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Roberts is less ideological but, as can be seen on voting rights cases, can be intensely partisan.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@MikeSacksEsq Think this also true given some of his pro bono work while in private practice.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.