And to be clear, I'm not advocating tossing entire Section 2 VRA. I'm talking about algorithms superseding its redistricting interpretation.
-
-
-
I don't know what that would mean in practice compared to tossing it entirely.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, actually. Whereas it was once essential to electing minority candidates of choice, it's now suppressing new opportunities.
-
§2 isn't limiting minority opportunities; it's the conservative SCOTUS' view of the law. Many states could draw additional minority seatspic.twitter.com/qWvoG5PNzP
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Don't get me wrong, though. As long as redistricting is in the hands of partisans, Section 2 is needed. What I support is ending both.
-
I can see both sides of this argument, the biggest question for me would be is there still vestigial discrimination in geographical demos.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.