It has fingerprints of Breyer (especially the writing style) all over it. Likely with support from CJ Roberts, Kagan, Kennedy /3
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
It splits the difference--let's each side declare victory, as is clear from early reactions--and says little on the merits. /4
2 replies 10 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
And, as
@LeahLitman says, there's a good chance the Court never needs to reach the merits. So the partial stay avoids hardships but /51 reply 4 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen @LeahLitman
lets the government credibly claim it can keep out those most likely to do U.S. harm and preserves President's general prerogatives /6
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen @LeahLitman
It might be administratively messy (as Leah suggests) and perhaps incoherent as law, but centrist political compromise /7
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen @LeahLitman
More broadly it lets us divide
#SCOTUS into three camps in these kinds of cases centrist block, hard right, and hard left /81 reply 4 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rickhasen @LeahLitman
centrists-Breyer, Kagan, Kennedy, Roberts hard right--Alito, Gorsuch, Thomas hard left--Ginsburg, Sotomayor
1 reply 5 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen @LeahLitman
If this is right, then when Kennedy leaves and Roberts is the swing Justice, he's likely to be more institutionalist than hard right /11
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen @LeahLitman
What I mean by that is Roberts is more likely to vote in the center for pragmatic reasons even if his ideology lines up w/hard right /12
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen @LeahLitman
Best institutionalist option in
#travelban is this partial compromise stay, followed by a decision NEVER reaching merits /131 reply 1 retweet 5 likes
and today's order seems to tee up that possibility nicely (if so, expect strong dissent from Gorsuch, Alito, Thomas) 14/14
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen @LeahLitman
This is good analysis. I'd add partial stay reinforces some remedial principles Roberts has cared about (see, e.g. WInter v NRDC, etc.).
1 reply 5 retweets 8 likes -
thank you all
0 replies 1 retweet 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.