Would be great if @washingtonpost could clarify if "officials" in this article (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/special-counsel-is-investigating-jared-kushners-business-dealings/2017/06/15/5d9a32c6-51f2-11e7-91eb-9611861a988f_story.html?utm_term=.ae99f4cdb0a6 …) are U.S. officials and /1https://twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/875531700633296896 …
-
anyone else think it is weird that Mueller office declining comment speaks of leaks from "members"?pic.twitter.com/4E6Z20Gxf2
Normal thing would be to say "employees" not "members", no? /3
-
-
"Members" like "team members" is a reasonable reading from where I sit.
-
Yes. Team members
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Members of Congress?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But we say "members of SG office" not "employees of SG office"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The team likely has some big egos who may not want to be referred to as "employees".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i didnt take it that way -- likely refers to ``members`` of the investigative team
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Likely because he refers to his group as a "team"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You'd think
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.