Some consistency with his Shelby County "current needs" language, right?
-
-
-
yeah but that was about state's rights, not the rights of people.
-
Agreed, which triggered equal sovereignty principle. But still equal protection. "Current needs" wasn't limited to state claims, was it?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In which direction, for us non-lawyerly, concerned types? Pro-rights?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I was just thinking that. Roberts signed onto a living constitution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.