Grewal's *article,* not brief. Sorry.
DOJ borrowing from @AndyGrewal without attributionhttps://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/873563426106126337 …
-
-
-
The government also included
@SethBTillman discussion of G. Washington's business transactions on p. 53 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2957162 …pic.twitter.com/6Ek0PvtJPp
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you. If an academic published PP. 39, 42-47 of the DOJ brief without attribution, no doubt unethical. Unsure of standards for briefs.
-
As
@jciv points out, article also shows what types of payments to TrumpOrg would be unconstitutional. Does that justify non-citation? Dunno
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I was just reading it, knowing little about this subject, and thinking the brief was astonishingly well-researched. I guess this is why.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Omri_Marian@AndyGrewal The office that found Scavino violated Hatch Act must review as must DoJ IG. Exec Br owes more to Jud BrThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"borrowing"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.