Would it have to be a legal conclusion to use the word? As opposed to an anxiety or concern that's expressed when you call it inappropriate?
Again, there are not legal conclusions.https://twitter.com/jacobgershman/status/872518870128525318 …
-
-
-
Yes. The only reason why the word "obstruction" is significant is precisely because of its legal meaning.
-
If he had used that word in discussions with Sessions, he couldn't reveal what he told Sessions? Or he couldn't be that blunt with Sessions?
-
I thought he didn't discuss substance w/sessions at all because he expected he wd be recused. Big Q is what he wrote in 302s shared w/FBI.
-
You're totally right. Would it have been inappropriate for Comey to tell Trump mid-chat: "Watch it, you're flirting with obstruction here."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Guaranteed Comey will avoid all conclusions in questioning, too, knowing his testimony alone is
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.