Is that surprising? That's a legal conclusion, no? This is a "just the facts" kind of memo.https://twitter.com/jacobgershman/status/872516107302731781 …
-
-
-
"obstruction" has a certain legal bite / "inappropriate" might have some sort of legal implication but sort of weak tea really
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not terribly. But just the facts includes what he "found strange," so encompassing what was going through his mind at the time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which demonstrates that his memo-writing skills have improved in the past twelve months. Also that he had legal counsel vet the memo first.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It would overstep his role and seriously undermine his credibility to state such a legal conclusion
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.