If modern weapons are subject to the 2A, wouldn't the 1A encompasses twitter (and has no "well regulated militia" caveat)?
Is there really any question First Amendment applies to new technology? If so, how is Twitter NOT a public forum?https://twitter.com/robkelner/status/872241171388674049 …
-
-
-
"well regulated"
#2A aimed at near-universal armament by law, then in 1791 & 150+ yrs prior in the Colonies then independent States.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There is case Law on point
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't recall my 1A law well enough. Would calling it a public forum imply DT can't block? Because that seems wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because it's owned and serviced by a private company and subject to their terms of service. Seems obviously private property to me?
-
Which I realize is different from public forum, but that's quite a jump to say a private company's platform is a public forum.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It doesn't seem to be a substantial burden on speech, people can just make a new free twitter account to follow the president
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No question whatsoever. Tribe might be wrong, but certainly not for that reason.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.