Rejecting J. Kozinski view on why we should not infer intent from candidate statements (which I criticized @Slate: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/03/the_9th_circuit_s_alex_kozinski_defends_trump_s_travel_ban_on_first_amendment.html …)
"There is simply too much evidence that EO-2 was motivated by religious animus for it to survive any measure of constitutional review." n.22https://twitter.com/isamuel/status/867801459701805057 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that doesn't sound limited to upholding the injunction
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I can't believe it was a party line vote.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.