I hope this is all, and not that Kennedy signed on to a true reversal of his stance on partisan gerrymanderinghttps://twitter.com/ElectProject/status/866673914558242816 …
Some thoughts on why Justice Kagan lost Justice Kennedy in gerrymandering case today: http://electionlawblog.org/?p=92707 https://twitter.com/SamWangPhD/status/866713954021777409 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But is the abandoning of Easley a good thing for partisanship cases?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting. Thanks. So, do I read you to think that her losing Kennedy turns more on her departure from precedent than the merits itself?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Kennedy wrote in Bartlett that Sec. 2 is bright-line and states should not have to guess at crossover effects. Kagan holds the opposite, no?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.