Not betting on outcomes b/c not how Justice Gorsuch would decide. Clear during hearings - he rules based on law & facts, not personal views.
-
-
-
And what SCOTUS nominee ever admits otherwise? Yet if that were actually true, there would be no need for a vote.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What, the Affirmative Action Clause is missing from your Constitution?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.