Pretty weak rebuttal from @EdWhelanEPPC given the chargeshttps://twitter.com/ShaneGoldmacher/status/849464908014026753 …
-
It was a pre-buttal that appears only to have addressed subset of charges (some of which were dropped from stories)
-
-
You should have seen some of the other charges. "Plagiarism" to cite Holmes on 3 Gens of imbeciles b/c others did too.
-
The Holmes thing is silly, but
@rickhasen is right to call responses weak. There are different types of plagarism, but this still qualifies -
Not challenging that. My point is the sources of claims ("dark money"?) shopped a ton of crap allegations to create appearance of pattern
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.