Roe is gone as soon as Gorsuch is confirmed. They won't wait.
If Roe is on the line, and she wants to preserve it, this gives her a fig leaf to not vote against the nominee.https://twitter.com/BenJ_Rosenblatt/status/849484150478340096 …
-
-
-
They need either RBG or Kennedy to go before that happens.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Roe is constantly on the line with each new justice. I really don't see any difference between this time vs next time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
why wouldnt she just vote against this future hypothetical nominee if she'd be concerned about Roe?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Roberts upheld Partial-Birth Abortion Act a mere 2 years into his tenure. Collins voted to confirm him. Not sure Roe is a true deal breaker.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah? Good luck w/ that. I'm still waiting for Sen. Snowe to come around on the ACA.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Roe is a decoy. Roe will survive Gorsuch, with Kennedy's vote. And what the F does Susie need a fig leaf for, anyway?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If the next opening is RBG/AMK/SB, will not matter if the filibuster is technically available--GOP will roll over it by any means necessary.
-
And if they can't get to 51 to break filibuster, they won't get to 51 to confirm nominee.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So Democrats be weak now on the chance that maybe one Republican senator will come to our aide at an uncertain point in the future?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.