That's not my position.
Gorsuch plagiarism defenses: 1. Author whose words stolen says ok 2. It was in a dissertation, so different standards 3. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/849464588806574080 …
-
-
-
wasn't implying it was. Wrote that last night. Why would you think I was talking about you?
-
Just because I've chimed in too (and you stopped at 3)
-
gotcha. had not updated list since last night and have not seen your other defenses
-
Here's my post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/04/05/the-politics-of-personal-destruction-neil-gorsuch-edition/?utm_term=.c69cea09f7cb … It's embarrassing, but doesn't appear symptomatic of larger problem.
-
super odd: when I went to volokh before I asked this post did not appear
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If it's good enough for FLOTUS it's good enough for SCOTUS
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The lengths ppl will go to defend stone-obvious plagiarism. Partisanship is a hell of a drug.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1. maybe; 2. no
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I do not recall being able to use different standard in grad school at the University of Toronto.
#worthwhileCanadianinitiativeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
u forgot "science can't be reworded"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Uh, wait, is 1 true?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.