Trip down memory lane: Judicial Confirmation Network: Sotomayor Is A Discriminatory Activisthttps://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2009/05/judicial-confirmation-network-sotomayor-is-a-discriminatory-activist/18258/?utm_source=twb …
Do you remember all the stuff about J. Sotomayor and the "wise Latina"? And all the talk about the problem with "empathy?"https://twitter.com/AdamCharnes/status/849465720933056515 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm not talking about what political activists say. I'm talking about what senators, law professors and those who should know better say
-
Well Senators took up JCN's "wise Latina" schtick as well. Also, I don't totally understand the defense of "he copied facts, not argument"?
-
Total kid gloves for Sotomayor! http://www.salon.com/2009/07/15/sotomayor_hearings_2/ … bonus articles with anonymous sources calling her stupid.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Or Kagan as being "inexperienced" and that she would take away first amendment rights. But yeah, Garland had it easy ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you think those critiques were as nasty as what we are seeing now, we will need to agree to disagree.
-
Critiques? Did you read the article he provided? They're calling her a racist.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.