Tit-for-tat strategy does well in the long run. https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerkay/2011/12/19/generous-tit-for-tat-a-winning-strategy/#718ff9d366eb …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
judgment based on ethos of time is not simply "emotion over logic" and "maybes" relying on Trump supporters not very logical either
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Where is the reason behind your play, if reason allows us to predict that future GOP behavior will produce the same outcome (loss of FB)?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That has been the "argument" from the get-go.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Politics is emotion
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. Honor over betrayal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There's more emotion on your side, believing we will return to some Senate which cares about norms or people will care about SCOTUS noms.
-
If RBG retires and gets replaced by a Fed Soc guy, the public won't care all. They can't even name all the Justices.
-
All this byzantine procedural fights don't mean a thing to the general public. Better to listen to activists.
-
Dems could have asked for a real concession, like a Select Committee on Trump. But a promise from McConnell not to nuke in future is nothing
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.