both can be true: Schumer is looking for a deal, but isn't bluffing. No deal -> actual filibuster.
Why believe @SenSchumer on filibuster? Just as likely a bluff to get a better deal on judges or something else at this point.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
why don't you believe him? but quite possible end game EVENTUALLY is a deal if eight senators peel off / wait for terms first
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I figured because it would be harder for GOP to blow up filibuster over individual nom vs. flat refusal to entertain.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which is exactly why Dems need to filibuster! No one thinks they can or will do it. Only GOP shuts down the govt.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bad deals didn't stop Harry Reid though.
@rickhasen@SenSchumerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.