I would not support any deal with McConnell if that was directed at me. Separate q if Dems should try filibusterhttps://twitter.com/sweetal/status/844700367388520449 …
-
Senate Dems are suckers if they a) go for anything close to Coons-floated deal or b) give McConnell 60 votes on cloture
.@brianefallon @bmaz My thoughts on Judge Gorsuch and the filibuster http://electionlawblog.org/?p=91762
-
-
There is no q in my mind they'll nominate arch-conservative next time too, even if RBG seat. And wld go nuclear to confirm
-
Absolutely agree. Just think the battle better+more effectively joined there than here. Sucks to say that though!
-
What is gained by waiting to join battle then? Difference between 5-4 conservative majority and 6-3 wont animate public
-
do believe case can be made, which cannot be made now, as to how much law would change with 5th vote
-
.
@brianefallon@bmaz on cases like affirmative action and abortion, it would be a new 5th vote, not new 6th vote. That's the key point. -
.
@brianefallon@bmaz Liberals don't realize how much J. Kennedy,& J. O'Connor before him, blunted the most conservative instincts of#SCOTUS - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
They buy midterm mobilization which has been non-existent for Dems. McConnell gets SCOTUS but loses House.
-
So Dems who didn't care about SCOTUS in Pres election have to have this now for midterms?? Thats insane.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I reluctantly had already come to that conclusion. Don't feel good about it+am taking some major flak. But, still.
-
Respectfully disagree w
@rickhasen on logic of waiting:https://twitter.com/SoapboxO/status/845271507362308097 … -
I do not. He is exactly right.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.