It was a judicial fact that could not be rebutted with evidence. See American Tradition Partnership v. Bullock.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I cannot see how Gorsuch is right that Congress has ample room to enact expenditure limits after Citizens United. Is he misunderstanding?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Are you getting paid to watch this crap? Because otherwise it's just masochism.
-
I've been teaching and in a faculty meeting....so missed all the excitements since earlier today
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Carmenr1Carmen How can you even follow his convo. He says the right words in no particular order. He's sleazy & phony.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Okay, that's scary. Gorsuch doesn't even know the law, except as it applies to his prejudices?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Plz write longer explanation and take screen shot and append as photo. Needs elucidation. Thank you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that seems like an important distinction
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I recall when Clarence Thomas under oath claimed he never considered whether Roe v Wade valid btw 1973-1971
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@BPSNightmare but do the Senators know that?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NormOrnstein it is corrupt and should not be a non profit if it is. Donations should not be tax deductible if they are.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.