Judge Kozinski doesn't want litigators going on an "evidentiary snark hunt" looking for campaign statements showing discriminatory intent
Judge Kozinski has given conservatives on #SCOTUS a First Amendment crutch for upholding the travel ban. Me @slate:http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/03/the_9th_circuit_s_alex_kozinski_defends_trump_s_travel_ban_on_first_amendment.html …
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
One thing I'm foggy on: why rely on candidate statements when statements as Pres have shown the same animus? "Muslim ban," etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In what universe can what you say you believe not be used as evidence? Other than NLRA 8(c)?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can a person who says they intend to commit a hate crime, use the 1A in court when tried for that exact crime?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.