@JeffreyToobin says no pres statements shld b considered. I'm not expert but how does judge understand pretext w/o statements? 1/
Toobin and J Kosinski on same page here https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/842912676346970114 …https://twitter.com/jeffreytoobin/status/843095412428980224 …
-
-
-
I get not neces formal & perhaps don't reflect debate & input, but seems pres shld b acctble for what he says 2/
-
in context of policy he makes. And w
#ExecutiveOrder, courts r primary method of acctblty, right? Or wrong? 3/ -
esp when a
#constitutional violation at issue? Free speech (?) of pres v estab of religion protections of ppl? 4/4
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.