And here's the key point from the District court in blocking part of the new travel EO on Establishment Clause groundspic.twitter.com/ywbVLLo7m8
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
And here's the key point from the District court in blocking part of the new travel EO on Establishment Clause groundspic.twitter.com/ywbVLLo7m8
And the animus is shown by President Trump's comments themselvespic.twitter.com/l3nv4oXSaA
And on how Trump's anti-Muslim motives are neither "veiled" nor "secret"pic.twitter.com/1XqJbFWsiU
District court concludes nationwide injunction is appropriate and denies a stay, setting up attempt to get relief from Ninth Circuit. But...pic.twitter.com/LiCZnlisN5
Ordinarily temporary restraining orders are not appealable. Yet 9th Circuit in #WAvTrump allowed appeal, treating TRO as prelim. injunction
Didn't matter last time in #WavTrump, where R and D appointed judges on panel were unanimous. Now we've got two Obama appointees and one GWB
Case turns very little on immigration law and power of executive there. It is ALL about religious discriminatory purpose.
Also interesting:court gives short shrift to gov't argument on national security need. I don't believe gov't put in classified info to court
9th Cir. had suggested last time that if national security need for EO was serious, court could take classified info under special procedure
And you can see how much DOJ has been hurt by earlier 9th Circuit decision in Washington case, still on the books
It's no wonder DOJ asked 9th Cir. en banc to take the unusual step of "vacating" (or erasing) that panel decision. So far to no avail
But that opinion will continue to hurt, and shows lasting damage of precipitous action last time.
Is this opinion vulnerable? Possibly---cases on "motive" and involving national security could lead to differences of opinion. Also on scope
It is possible, once again, that this case ends up at #SCOTUS, probably before J. Gorsuch would get confirmed. Would Court split 4-4? Maybe.
Here's a link to district court opinion, courtesy of @joshgerstein http://politi.co/2nGqk2t
Key lesson Trump Administration should (but likely won't learn): avoid self-inflicted wounds.
Thank you for the nice analysis. The order itself is very well-written. Fun to read.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.