Pro tip: When you are parsing words in a controversy, you are usually not winning
This is not to say Sessions could be successfully prosecuted for perjury. Good chance he couldn't. But he's damaged politically
-
-
presumes he's telling the truth abt reason for mtg the ambassador. If he did discuss the election, perjury much more likely.
-
put another way, unless it can be proved he is lying about reason for mtg, no chance of perjury
-
I think it's about what was discussed. This makes it even clearer:https://twitter.com/SenatorLeahy/status/837330800488099841 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How is point blank denial an honest mistake? Marion Jones went to prison, Clemons tried & they were athletes. This is the USAG!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sessions' ans not perjury - bec nonresponsive to Franken's Q. See Bronston v US case. BUT - a Sec 1001(a) false statement.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm not sure he could even be impeached in court with that testimony. By the appearance is bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.