Ninth Circuit may review yesterday's panel order http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/2017_0210_ninth_circuit.pdf …
-
-
Replying to @jacobgershman
Via
@jacobgershman: don't go home those following Trump EO litigation in 9th Circuit. One of the judges on own motion asks for en banc /16 replies 41 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
This means that even if the Trump Admin. never requested it, there's now a request to entire 9th Circuit to reconsider yesterdays' order /2
3 replies 18 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
It takes a majority of judges to vote to hear case "en banc," and if ordered it ordinarily means 11 judges (Chief and 10 picked random) /3
2 replies 12 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
although there's a procedure for the full court (25? active judges) to hear case. I don't think that's been successfully called /4
2 replies 8 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
Many more D-appointed than R-appointed judges on court, but some of the D-appointed are less liberal. Still seems like long shot /5
3 replies 8 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
But if it is granted, the 11-judge panel could skew more conservative than 9th Circuit as a whole, so there's a chance /6
3 replies 7 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
10-1 says it was O'Scannlain who called for en banc hearing.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidgweininger @rickhasen
My bet is on Bybee. O'Scannlain is senior status now.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.