It takes a majority of judges to vote to hear case "en banc," and if ordered it ordinarily means 11 judges (Chief and 10 picked random) /3
-
-
Interesting alternative reason from
@chris_j_walker to go en banc: to get rid of 3-judge panel opinion: https://twitter.com/chris_j_walker/status/830203910694518785 … /14 -
not sure enough votes to go en banc, but provides opportunity for govt to moot precedent by replacing EO.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Also at this point only thing decided is propriety of TRO; no precedential decision on merits. Militates against en banc, cert.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.