This means that even if the Trump Admin. never requested it, there's now a request to entire 9th Circuit to reconsider yesterdays' order /2
-
-
Bottom line: just when you thought it was time for drinks Friday afternoon, there's more work to do /13
#appellatetwitter -
Interesting alternative reason from
@chris_j_walker to go en banc: to get rid of 3-judge panel opinion: https://twitter.com/chris_j_walker/status/830203910694518785 … /14 - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Hannity is giving Trump advice on amending the ban. If it could be any active or sr. judge, is it likely/OK one was lobbied?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what are the chances one of these judges asked for this in a show of complete unity against the order instead of poss for dissent
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Admin having declined to pursue, no way on Gods earth this gets heard en banc. Dissent from rehearing >> SCOTUS application essay
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ah, that helps!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.