Via @jacobgershman: don't go home those following Trump EO litigation in 9th Circuit. One of the judges on own motion asks for en banc /1
-
and that might be what this is all about /10
If you want to impress your non-lawyer friends (1) sua sponte - judge's own request (not party) (2) dissental http://www.yalelawjournal.org/forum/i-say-dissental-you-say-concurral … /11
-
-
to be clear, this could have come from any active or senior 9th Cir. judge---not likely the 3 judges on unanimous panel /12
-
Bottom line: just when you thought it was time for drinks Friday afternoon, there's more work to do /13
#appellatetwitter -
Interesting alternative reason from
@chris_j_walker to go en banc: to get rid of 3-judge panel opinion: https://twitter.com/chris_j_walker/status/830203910694518785 … /14 - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe they think issue important enough to merit en banc review, even to confirm. Or want to write better opinion, w/ more time.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Zing.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Or Kozinski, conservative immigrant son of Holocaust survivors, wants a shot at writing new, confirming opinion?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
or to write a stronger, maybe 11-0, opinion to set stage for SCOTUS. Could have different reasoning, same result.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@AnthonyMKreis@YaleLJournal this is why law needs to be written in plain English.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.