I had thought I read DOJ was going to move to stay the TRO, which would be an appealable interlocutory order. https://twitter.com/BobLoeb/status/828029360527536128 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
On page 5 of 9th Cir. brief,WA seeks to distinguish SEIU case on appealiabity of TRO http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2017/02/06/17-35105%20Washington%20Opposition.pdf …. Gives 9th way out if it wants
Also, and maybe more importantly, gives #SCOTUS a way to be unanimous and punt: TRO not appealable so no jurisdiction
-
-
This would put the issue off until same judge issues a preliminary injunction, which would then be subject to new appeal, and then to SCOTUS
-
though if the trial court moves quickly enough on PI, case could be consolidated with TRO appeal, eliminating the jurisdiction out
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
btw my state AG is bae!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yes but, assuming the dist ct issues a similar ruling after briefing, would the same appeals occur?
-
But correctly denying appeal as a TRO would give an extra month to try to figure a way out of the jam
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
translate for non lawyer?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.