Here's example of considering judge's off the record statement, in emergency 9th Cir. case that made it to #SCOTUS http://electionlawblog.org/?p=84619 https://twitter.com/JoshMBlackman/status/828316667180699648 …
-
I have never seen a court affirm a lower-court opinion based on something judge stated during args but that's not in opinion.
I understand. I also expect the will be something in writing before 9th Circuit rules
-
-
That timing is unfair. Would SG have opportunity to respond to written opinion before CA9 rules? There is a moving target
-
Is it still possible for CA9 to decide TRO is just TRO and not de-facto PI and wait for the PI? Or is die cast?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.