I had thought I read DOJ was going to move to stay the TRO, which would be an appealable interlocutory order. https://twitter.com/BobLoeb/status/828029360527536128 …
-
-
.
@smmarotta DOJ brief (at page 8 - http://politi.co/2lapRoy ) cites this very case as sole authority on appealability of TRO -
On page 5 of 9th Cir. brief,WA seeks to distinguish SEIU case on appealiabity of TRO http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2017/02/06/17-35105%20Washington%20Opposition.pdf …. Gives 9th way out if it wants
-
Also, and maybe more importantly, gives
#SCOTUS a way to be unanimous and punt: TRO not appealable so no jurisdiction -
This would put the issue off until same judge issues a preliminary injunction, which would then be subject to new appeal, and then to SCOTUS
-
though if the trial court moves quickly enough on PI, case could be consolidated with TRO appeal, eliminating the jurisdiction out
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
to me, that strongly cuts against Tro=prelim injunction. But not my area of specialty, FWIW.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Robart's order is explicit that it is a TRO until the court can rule on prelim. injunction, briefing schedules due Mon
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What's the standard to reverse TRO on appeal?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.