I don't read bios. Is it so hard for writer to disclose conflict in the same piece?
My point is that anyone who would think enough to care whether Katyal has conflict and reads the bio would figure he has cases before Courthttps://twitter.com/dickius/status/827540643912232961 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The point of disclosure is to obviate need for research. When I saw op-ed, my immediate reaction was "this is beat sweetener."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Per
@spaydl article NYT editors were not aware of his cases before SC.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
anyone who would think enough to care can figure out risks faced by corps. They still have to disclose them in 10-K.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But I was so excited when Katyal retweeted me yesterday! Don't take away my small victory
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
99% will see it in NYT and just think "this is a Clintonista endorsing Gorsuch."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.