Yep. I wasn't disagreeing w/ your description of it as a "mini-nuclear option". Just providing a gloss.
-
-
-
so they're treating quorum rules like waiveable, not structural, error?
-
Might makes right in this case, but I don't see how treating quorum as waiveable makes any sense. /1
-
The whole point of a quorum requirement is to keep a minority of the body from taking action. /2
-
If you need to be present to raise Point of Order, what stops the chairman from acting unilaterally? /3
-
Gavel in in a room by him/herself, seek UC, and gavel out without objection (as to quorum or merits)? /4
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.