My sense is Dems more likely to use & lose it on a SC nominee; less likely to lose it on leg motions.Thoughts here https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/11/14/this-is-why-senate-republicans-might-not-go-nuclear/?utm_term=.4c5dc649191d …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@bindersab 100% certainty that they eliminate it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
McConnell already poised to do away with it (and blame it on Dens)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@bindersab R's proved there is no penalty for it so why wouldn't they. Really stupid not to.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
depends on if McConnell wants a ready-made excuse for why some Trump priorities aren't passed: "we tried really hard, promise!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is one where I hope Mitch McConnell can remember Republicans won't be in the majority forever and Trump might not be the hill to die on
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1/Even if it doesn't survive, it will be good that Republicans would be the ones to kill it after relying on it so extensively.
-
2/Democrats should force the issue. Not through reflexive obstructionism ala McConnell, but strong opposition to bad policy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Pretty good, I'd say. Plenty of senators remember 2008 and 2004.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.