.@rickhasen @GregStohr Thrice in 15 mos.
How common is it that these things are missed on a conflicts check the first time through?https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/816768779568943104 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scalia would have waved the conflict away and accused those who point out the conflict of skulduggery.
-
Know you're being flip, but Scalia didn't own a lot of individual stocks. It's a Roberts//Breyer/Alito thing.
-
Def being flip, but Scalia didn't seem terribly sympathetic to COI/ appearance of impropriety concerns.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@GregStohr Credit where credit is due for the Chief Justice. Trump and congressional R's may not have ethics but he seems to.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Corporate ownership is right there in the Rule 29.6 statement on the second page of their opening brief.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Given the parent/sub issue, probably fairly often.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.