@sinderbrand They called it "intense criticism" which is a blatant lie.https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/816336586380087296 …
-
-
-
single, or even multiple, news orgs ≠ "the media" (I get the urge to lump everyone together, always; it's just not accurate)
-
By this logic, it is never fair to use the term "the media" to describe anything, since some outlets will always differ
-
That piece you linked is dripping with contempt. Won't be very convincing to critics. Or must I say "most critics"?
-
we must recognize the two categories of humans: lumpers and splitters. they will always argue.
-
yeah, it's a reporter thing. Most reporters at big orgs *have to* be splitters...or face the wrath of the copy desk!
-
I say this with affection, being a splitter myself.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sinderbrand Uh,DUH!It was millions of voters calling in&using their voices!Trump'll take the credit 4it.Narcissusts R like that. -
My 2 cents: internal GOP issue. Passage of House rules threatened. Reps don't care what we think.pic.twitter.com/naDURnWCs0
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Excuse me! It was voter outrage jamming phone lines and writing emails that stopped this insanity! Americans stood up!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@guardian's@SmithInAmerica referred to "flexing of muscle." Embarrassing.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
in other words, "some in 'the media'" or "many in 'the media.'" Since some/many others did not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Political theater. Nothing more.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.