@NateSilver538 By all accounts, the group asking for the investigation is very credible.
And, as I say, the fact that the analysis is not publicly available, makes evaluating it turn only on credibility http://electionlawblog.org/?p=89454 https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/801222961541816321 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NateSilver538@joshtpm I wonder if this is being floated as some sort of trial balloon to see what the gut response would be?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Stepping back for a second, this is exactly what Russia wanted--no *proof* of hacking and yet lots of folks want it to be true
-
At the end of the day, this will come down to the WH, not Clinton. If WH is against it, not a chance in hell it goes anywhere.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.