Agree. The order makes no sense otherwise as "Clinton for Presidency" isn't even an entity that exists nor was it a party.
If it is a typo we will see it corrected in short order.https://twitter.com/TheOCP2too/status/794635437880930305 …
-
-
-
"Donald J. Trump for President" is, however, an entity that exists and a party to the suit.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@TheOCP2too not a typo. Judge chose to include both sides. Neither ODP nor HFA engaging in prohibited activities so no issue.
-
No, order doesn't list ODP as a restrained party.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.