+1 for through counsel, but we might know more if you had a copy of the summons (ecf 44)
Help from legal twitter: My experience is appellate law.Trial folks, is this order for Stone to *personally* appear? http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/161103.pdf …https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/794312147693993984 …
-
-
-
I looked it up. Standard summons.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I read that as to only require appearance, either in person or through counsel. Normally just an atty would show.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
through counsel, it seems to me. If he wanted him to appear in person, he would have said "personally"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But Stone is flat out goofy. Who knows, he may show personally.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd call the Court to clarify. I don't think so.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
through counsel is fine for Stone tho could self-represent, entity must appear through counsel.
@joshtpmThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's treating a non-individual biz entity and Stone the same, it's gotta mean through counsel, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.