So to recap: 1. Dems seek to extend RNC consent decree against voter intimidation in part because of Trump actions http://electionlawblog.org/?p=88127
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
2. Tonight court ordered RNC to report on all Trump, RNC, and state "ballot security" stuff that could violate order http://electionlawblog.org/?p=88394
4 replies 99 retweets 98 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
3. And now Dems have some proof RNC lied saying it is not doing poll watching, with evidence of worker in NV http://electionlawblog.org/?p=88403
12 replies 133 retweets 137 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
4. And if court believes Rs lied, then judge likely to not be kind to RNC as this case heads to Friday hearing. <end>
2 replies 61 retweets 82 likes
5. This is a big deal because Ds will get heads up on RNC election day plans and because they might uncover violations of order <really end>
9:27 PM - 31 Oct 2016
1 reply
50 retweets
90 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.