So to recap: 1. Dems seek to extend RNC consent decree against voter intimidation in part because of Trump actions http://electionlawblog.org/?p=88127
-
3. And now Dems have some proof RNC lied saying it is not doing poll watching, with evidence of worker in NV http://electionlawblog.org/?p=88403
4. And if court believes Rs lied, then judge likely to not be kind to RNC as this case heads to Friday hearing. <end>
-
-
5. This is a big deal because Ds will get heads up on RNC election day plans and because they might uncover violations of order <really end>
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Do you think judge allowing relatively wide-ranging discovery in New Jersey consent decree case signals the judge’s feelings?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.