I get your point, but it makes sense to me that speech *proving* a vote should only be restricted if there's a compelling reason.
1st Amendment rights aren't suspended, but interests in election integrity on other side of ballot selfie debate http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/08/17/why-the-selfie-is-a-threat-to-democracy/ …https://twitter.com/ArsVampyre/status/791315879522729984 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't find your argument compelling. Take a picture, throw the ballot out and vote another one. Say you made a mistake.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ArsVampyre Ballot selfie bans aren't narrowly tailored enough or broad enough to survive 1st Amdt scrutiny. -
I'd agree. I do find the argument for a ban is with more merit than I previously thought.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I was very much pro-ballot selfie but definitely think you raise some good points. I'm in the middle now. Dang you, Rick!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.