I'm still expecting Garland confirmation in lame duck if Dems will be retaking Senate.https://twitter.com/DavidLat/status/790565331102232577 …
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
Interesting; you don't think the left will have a "we can do better" view, let's wait until 2017?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidLat
.
@DavidLat Here's why I think@EdWhelanEPPC is wrong and Judge Garland gets confirmed in lame duck IF Democrats take Senate /15 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
First, Obama will be loyal to Garland and not withdraw nomination and Garland won't withdraw unless Clinton asks. Clinton won't ask /2
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
despite pressure from the left to withdraw Garland for younger and more liberal candidate. Getting Garland out of way during lame duck /3
3 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
clears her first 100-day agenda without a nasty Supreme Court fight that eats other things. RBG has signaled she and/or Breyer will /4
3 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
leave the court while Dems still control Senate (before 2017). This means she can get 1 or 2 more liberal Justices on Court and/or /5
4 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
make it a big issue in the midterms, in the hopes of turning about Dem turnout problem in the midterms /6
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
With Garland done in lame duck, Clinton has very good chance of 1, and some chance of 2, liberal appts before 2018 elections 7/7 <end>
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
If they withdraw Garland though, it's very likely 2, maybe 3.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.