#ELB: Wake Up Progressives: The 2016 Election is Now All About the Supreme Court and Every Issue You Care About http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87734
-
opting for the nuclear option hurts Garland's odds, right? Why go to all that trouble just to confirm a 64 year old moderate?
.@MarkEHartman Dems won't go nuclear for Garland. He'll get confirmed in lame duck by Mitch McConnell. I'm talking Breyer, Ginsburg
-
-
Once Ct median has shifted to a D, will 40 Rs really filibuster next nominee, knowing that Ds will be willing to nuke?
-
yes because that allows GOP to confirm their next nominee with 50 votes?
-
Rs can go nuclear at any time in the future if they get majority. Why push it when they're in the minority?
-
if you don't use it because you are afraid they will take it away then what good is having it?
-
Could be useful for ideologically extreme candidates but backfire if used for routine obstruction.
-
there will soon be no filibuster for any SC candidate
-
there is no reason for the filibuster to exist in any context - do away with it
-
I think we need to have a filibuster for legislation
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
makes perfect sense. Thanks!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.