Makes me wonder if some people complaining about NYT coverage of Trump and Clinton don't actually read NYT.
People keep retweeting this.But NYT did cover Trump-Bondi, today, on A1, doing a very good job.I expect more to comehttps://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/772560731677954048 …
-
-
-
And Trump-Bondi is still, this late in the day, on the front top left of the
@nytimes home page.pic.twitter.com/urzLnixjmX
-
so here's an interesting one: let's say bondi really didn't go after DT bc of donation. Is that count as official act?
-
no question a prosecutor's decision not to prosecute would be an official act.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sometimes public prodding helps.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your "very good job" is at least 3 months too late.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So defensive and proud you are. We all knew of this from other sources for a long time. From 6/7/2016 https://politicalwire.com/2016/06/07/bondi-asked-for-trump-donation-before-nixing-case/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
in a Huffpo article 22 days ago on 8/15: "Trump’s charitable arm gave Bondi $25,000, in September, and Bondi dropped the case."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.