.@rickhasen @ChaimGordon actually it WAS illegal for Trump Foundation to make the donation, regardless of intent. That's the law.
Agree that's what the law *should* be, but not what it ishttps://twitter.com/chaimgordon/status/772973030754639872 …
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Should get much closer scrutiny though, no? Even with SCOTUS majorities' sharp "quid pro quo."
@rickhasen -
Surely "money as speech" has some practical limits? :-)
@rickhasen@ChaimGordon -
IMO, current doctrine would sustain a law forbidding subjects from contributing to investigating AG's PAC.
-
I think, nay, hope you would be right. But think it would be appealed all the way up.
@ChaimGordon@rickhasen -
I love CU, but I think this would be sustained.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.