.@rickhasen Lack of coverage because no news peg? Also no stories on $35k to Greg Abbott who killed probe of Trump Uhttps://twitter.com/juddlegum/status/772468719549284352 …
.@NormOrnstein I agree (and have been tweeting) that Trump-Bondi is major omission at NYT. But it doesn't render all coverage suspect
-
-
Intensity of focus on Clinton scandals that never quite add up vs. ignoring Trump scandals in toto kinda does.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A pile of bad stories is what tenders it suspect.
-
MSM formulaic coverage of HRC built on sinking sand of innuendo hypothetical gross mischaracterization
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And this? 8/2016:
@nytimes incorrectly identifies IT person who used BleachBit to delete files as Clinton "aide"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the coverage pretty much entirely is fundamentally flawed. It's biased against truth justice and the American way
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And this? 7/2015: Reported DOJ launched criminal investigation into Hillary emails - fixed lede after midnight
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And this? 3/2015:
@nytimes used "Clinton Cash" as source for Clinton Foundation "exposé" - fails to report on book's errorsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
how about the lie inNY times that she was under criminal investigation is that suspect?let's not get started on MD.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@rickhasen It sure as bloody hell diminishes their credibility. And this ain't a free, weekly paper. It's the (allegedly) grand, superb NYTThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And this? [I won't bother to mention every column written by
@NYTimesDowd]http://linkis.com/www.esquire.com/news/bChPU …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
unfortunately they've been ridiculous for over a year. Just how many people have been let go? 2,that I know of
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like their world or even NY stuff much better then politics
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If it were the ONLY thing, no , but it's part of ongoing resort to utterly dubious sources. NYT no longer reliable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trump hiring models as young as 14 without visas is a second very major, huge omission by the NYT.
@NormOrnstein -
and constantly publishing whatever is released by Judicial Watch with the same exact spin as Judicial Watch.
@NormOrnstein
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
By giving equal weight to vague ?s and real data they prove they either have no judgment or are biased.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yea it does
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.