Dunno I'd say malice. But I think it goes well beyond these structural points u note. NYT has deep issues with Hillzhttps://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/772512995335245825 …
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
good stories on Trump U, debt, race discrimination in housing, sexism, vote rigging comments. But /2
2 replies 4 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
Problem is Times' (and MSM's) lack of focus on Trump sleaze factor: money in politics, using politics to protect from business dealings /3
4 replies 7 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
And part of that is the lack of a news peg. If he's a sleaze what is there to report? But bigger problem is HRC coverage which /4
2 replies 4 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
has tended to make more of CF/State access and special deals than seems to be warranted based on the evidence. But /5
1 reply 3 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
as the newspaper of record, the Times has a very tough job threading the needle, and when it stumbles everyone pounces. /6
6 replies 2 retweets 2 likes
This has been worsened by internet/social media deadlines, which led to awful Healy lede on Trump Mexico/immigration story /end
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
Disagree. I see soc media helping, all the news is out there for the taking. HRC/trump supporters claim bias all day anyway.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.