Dunno I'd say malice. But I think it goes well beyond these structural points u note. NYT has deep issues with Hillzhttps://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/772512995335245825 …
-
has tended to make more of CF/State access and special deals than seems to be warranted based on the evidence. But /5
as the newspaper of record, the Times has a very tough job threading the needle, and when it stumbles everyone pounces. /6
-
-
This has been worsened by internet/social media deadlines, which led to awful Healy lede on Trump Mexico/immigration story /end
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
the ethics and character of these two candidates as equal. No. I reject that and think it's disqualifying for their credibility.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
foundation where no impropriety has been found. If I seem a bit angry about it, I am. They're the paper of note, yet they present
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
when it comes to the clintons, they've been stumbling for 25 years. With stakes this high, they feel the need to play this game 1
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
running a fraudulent enterprise is more important a story than if she met with a person who's donated to their highly rated 2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
of making sure the issues each candidate has are equally proportional. A white nationalist does not equal bad email protocol.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.